La Shawn Barber (with links) on the firing of Christian talk-show host Marty Minto after he applied the Gospel to Pope John Paul II:
He said that the Bible makes it very clear that unless a person is born again, the person will never enter or see the kingdom of God. WORD-FM, a Christian radio station, fired Marty Minto because his response “alienated listeners.”
What is it about “born again” that’s so alienating? The concept is often maligned and mocked in our unbelieving culture, but every Bible-believing Christian knows it is how we are able to profess Christ. To be born again is to be made anew. The old self, separated from God, has died, and the new creation in Christ exists in its place. The passage that illustrates this most clearly is John 3.
The freedom to share the Gospel as taught in the Bible was why the Reformation took place. There was a time when people were being burned at the stake for not believing that bread was the literal body of Christ or that the mother of Jesus was sinless. While Marty Minto is no Martin Luther, he was doing what the Reformation gave him and others freedom to do. “Alienating listeners” is just a new cover on the same old, rotten book.
Roman Catholic Ales Rarus has the biggest "collection of the varying opinions...to sort out what really happened and why" that I have seen in one place, including his personal take:
LaShawn is an interesting blogger and I respect her opinions, but I think she's way off the mark here. Marty is not a martyr for the Reformation. He's a good guy with a loud mouth and chip on his shoulder. Even if he's right about the Catholic Church (Obviously I don't think he is), he certainly wasn't winning any souls to his side with his demeanor. You'll win more friends with honey than vinegar, friend. That doesn't mean obfuscating the Gospel to make it more palatable. I just means meeting people where they are in life and loving them as Christ would. They will know we are Christians by our love.
He has the statement from the station that fired Marty:
"The story in Thursday’s Pittsburgh Tribune Review would lead you to believe that we ended Mr. Minto’s program because 'He questioned if the pope’s Roman Catholic beliefs would impede his entry to heaven.' This statement did not come from the management of WORD-FM. A similar headline accompanied an AP wire story that unfortunately was not fact checked. We have never placed any restrictions on subject matter for the talk show. Mr. Minto knows that. The decision to release Mr. Minto had been under consideration for an extended period, primarily because of our concern that he tended to unnecessarily alienate listeners; and was finalized well before the pope was in the news. The conclusion that he was released because of his views on the pope is completely without foundation. We regret that you were left with a perception that is false."
When I've read interviews with Marty and the descriptions of what he said, I think, "Gee, he got fired for saying that?--on an evangelical station?" At the same time, I don't know him or any of the HOW he comes across, or any of the inside / confidential stuff that always affects a person's employement. A friend of mine is a serious evangelical in secular radio management and one of the first things he said was it didn't make sense and maybe the station had been looking to make a change for other reasons. I've been on the inside of these things and it's almost never as simple and clear-cut as some make it out to be (sometimes it's worse!). But if Marty keeps his cool and stays away from lawsuits and complaining and playing the martyr, it could turn out well for him and the Gospel. And if what the radio station has said is true (that his firing had nothing to do with his views on the pope), then they may feel a need to prove what they really believe and that could end up good for the Gospel, too.